MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393167882 · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2024.106393

Abstract 2212 An amphipathic helix drives interaction of Fibrillins with plastoglobule lipid droplets

2024· article· en· W4393167882 on OpenAlexafffund
Peter K. Lundquist, Kiran‐Kumar Shivaiah, Duncan Boren, Josh V. Vermaas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersOffice of Advanced CyberinfrastructureNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Centre for Supercomputing ApplicationsNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAmphiphileHelix (gastropod)ChemistryBiophysicsLipid dropletCell biologyBiochemistryBiologyPolymerOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plastoglobule lipid droplets of chloroplasts serve complex roles affecting plant development, stress tolerance and photosynthesis. They harbor a set of approximately 42 proteins that collectively dictate plastoglobule functions. Due to the monolayer structure of plastoglobules which encompass a neutral lipid core, these proteins must associate monotopically on the plastoglobule surface. However, targeting determinants have not been identified for plastoglobule proteins, and the protein-membrane interaction mechanisms that establish the plastoglobule proteome remain unclear. Here, we demonstrate that plastoglobule-localized Fibrillins (FBNs) harbor an amphipathic helix at the lip of their β-barrel that is necessary for proper plastoglobule association. Molecular dynamics simulations support the specific interaction of the amphipathic helix of Arabidopsis thaliana FBN1a with membranes rich in lipid packing defects which are expected to be especially prevalent on the tightly curved surface of plastoglobules. Introduction of one of the amphipathic helices into stromal- or thylakoid-localized FBNs was ineffective at redirecting the proteins to plastoglobules, likely due to endogenous protein-protein interactions that override the influence of the amphipathic helix. Proteomic analyses indicate AtFBN1a influences the plastoglobule proteome through outcompeting and recruiting specific proteins. We also demonstrate that the plastoglobule-localized FBNs, AtFBN1a and AtFBN7a, bind unsaturated fatty acids, particularly C18:1, and that elimination of the amphipathic helix suppresses fatty acid binding in AtFBN1a, but promotes fatty acid binding in AtFBN7a. Predicted amphipathic helices can be identified on two-thirds of plastoglobule proteins, indicating the use of amphipathic helices may be a general mechanism by which proteins selectively associate with plastoglobules. This work was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (MCB-2034631) to P.K.L. This work used Delta at NCSA through allocation BIO210061 from the Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Coordination Ecosystem Services & Supported (ACCESS) program, which is supported by National Science Foundation grants #2138259, #2138286. #2138307, #2137603, and #2138296.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological Chemistry→Same topicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies→French-language works237,207→