MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393171236 · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2024.3381553

A Decentralized Wide-Area Voltage Control Scheme for Coordinated Secondary Voltage Regulation Using PMUs

2024· article· en· W4393171236 on OpenAlexaff
Georgia Pierrou, Honglin Lai, Gabriela Hug, Xiaozhe Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltageVoltage regulationScheme (mathematics)Control theory (sociology)Electric power systemDecentralised systemAC powerControl (management)Computer scienceAutomatic Generation ControlEngineeringPower (physics)Electrical engineeringMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a novel decentralized purely data-driven Wide-Area Voltage Control (WAVC) scheme for improved coordinated secondary voltage regulation in power systems. To shape the decentralized control structure while accounting for the physical characteristics of the network, Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU) data are leveraged to estimate the electrical distances, conduct the zoning-based partitioning of the network in voltage control zones and decide which buses to choose as the pilot bus locations. The developed PMU-based decentralized WAVC strategy is independent of any system model information, does not require offline training and is adaptive to the available PMU dataset. Dynamic simulations on the IEEE 39- Bus benchmark system verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach under the deployment of the voltage control in one zone as well as the coordination of the voltage control response in a multi-zone system. Due to its data-driven nature, the proposed method can adapt to varying network configurations and topology conditions by updating the voltage control zones and the decentralized control design when required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power SystemsSame topicOptimal Power Flow DistributionFrench-language works237,207