MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393174092 · doi:10.24260/jkipp.v2i1.1260

PERBANDINGAN PRESTASI BELAJAR PADA MATERI METAMORFOSIS MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PICTURE AND PICTURE BERBANTUAN MEDIA PUZZLE DI KELAS IV

2023· article· en· W4393174092 on OpenAlex
Maryemah Maryemah, Ali Hasmy, Saumi Setyaningrum

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Karya Ilmiah Pendidik dan Praktisi SD&MI (JKIPP) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Media Use
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study is to describe: first, the learning achievement of students in metamorphosis material in Class IV Ulumuddin private elementary school who is not taught using the picture and picture model with the help of puzzle media for the 2021/2022 school year. Second, the learning achievement of students in metamorphosis material in grade IV Ulumuddin private elementary school who is taught using a picture and picture model with the help of puzzle media for the 2021/2022 school year. Third, the difference in learning achievement of students who are taught using a picture and picture model with the help of puzzle media on metamorphosis material in Class IV Ulumuddin private elementary school in the 2021/2022 school year.
 This study uses a quantitative approach with an experimental method in the form of a quasi-experiment. The research location is Ulumuddin private elementary school, Jalan Parit Leban, Punggur Kecil Village, Sungai Kakap District. The data sources are fourth grade students. The technique is in the form of measurement, documentation. The tools are in the form of a test/question sheet and a camera. Data analysis used instrument analysis, descriptive analysis and inferential analysis.
 The results of this study were concluded, namely: First, the learning achievement of students on metamorphosis material in grade IV Ulumuddin private elementary school who did not use the picture and picture model with the help of puzzle media for the 2021/2022 academic year obtained a learning achievement value with a percentage of 56.16%. Second, the learning achievement of students on metamorphosis material in grade IV Ulumuddin private elementary school who uses a picture and picture model with the help of puzzle media, obtained a learning achievement value with a percentage of (86.03%) in the category of Very High learning achievement. Third, the difference in learning achievement between students who are taught using the picture and picture model with the help of puzzle media and those who do not use the picture and picture model with the help of puzzle media can be shown with a significance level value of 0.000 which is smaller than 0.005 and it can be seen the magnitude of the effect of using the model. picture and picture with puzzle media, there is a learning achievement of 0.863% × 100% = 86.3%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it