Combined frequency domain near-infrared spectroscopy and diffuse correlation spectroscopy system for comprehensive metabolic monitoring of inspiratory muscles during loading
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SignificanceMechanical ventilation (MV) is a cornerstone technology in the intensive care unit as it assists with the delivery of oxygen in critically ill patients. The process of weaning patients from MV can be long and arduous and can lead to serious complications for many patients. Despite the known importance of inspiratory muscle function in the success of weaning, current clinical standards do not include direct monitoring of these muscles.AimThe goal of this project was to develop and validate a combined frequency domain near-infrared spectroscopy (FD-NIRS) and diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) system for the noninvasive characterization of inspiratory muscle response to a load.ApproachThe system was fabricated by combining a custom digital FD-NIRS and DCS system. It was validated via liquid phantom titrations and a healthy volunteer study. The sternocleidomastoid (SCM), an accessory muscle of inspiration, was monitored during a short loading period in fourteen young, healthy volunteers. Volunteers performed two different respiratory exercises, a moderate load and a high load, which consisted of a one-minute baseline, a one-minute load, and a six-minute recovery period.ResultsThe system has low crosstalk between absorption, reduced scattering, and flow when tested in a set of liquid titrations. Faster dynamics were observed for changes in blood flow index (BFi), and metabolic rate of oxygen (MRO2) compared with hemoglobin + myoglobin (Hb+Mb) based parameters after the onset of loads in males. Additionally, larger percent changes in BFi, and MRO2 were observed compared with Hb+Mb parameters in both males and females. There were also sex differences in baseline values of oxygenated Hb+Mb, total Hb+Mb, and tissue saturation.ConclusionsThe dynamic characteristics of Hb+Mb concentration and blood flow were distinct during loading of the SCM, suggesting that the combination of FD-NIRS and DCS may provide a more complete picture of inspiratory muscle dynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".