Experience of a therapeutic plasma exchange program in a pediatric intensive care unit: A single-center retrospective observational study from Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) may not have timely access to therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) for critically ill patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the common indications for TPE in a smaller tertiary PICU-developed TPE program and to evaluate the associated predictors of mortality. We hypothesized that a PICU-developed TPE program could provide timely access for a wide breadth of pathologies and can be delivered safely. Subjects and Methods: This was a retrospective case-comparison within-cohort study in a PICU from Canada. Data from pediatric patients between October 2015 and January 2022 was examined. The study included all patients < 18 years admitted to the PICU and requiring TPE. Multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (MODS) was defined to agree with the International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference. Proportions, medians, and interquartile ranges (IQR) were calculated where appropriate. Results: Twenty-five patients with a median age of 14 years underwent 118 acute TPE runs. The most common diagnosis (24%) was MODS. The median time from PICU admission to initiation of TPE was 38 h (IQR: 5–113.5) hours. The median PICU length of stay was 10 (IQR: 5.5–26) days. Twenty percent ( n = 5) of patients who received TPE acutely in the PICU required chronic TPE. There were no adverse events. Conclusions: TPE may be delivered quickly and safely from a small PICU for many indications, with MODS being the most common.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".