MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393217197 · doi:10.1093/jsxmed/qdae018.046

(PM-18) EXPLORING THE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN HYPERSEXUALITY AND SEX HORMONE: A PRELIMINARY STUDY IN BRAZILIAN MEN

2024· article· en· W4393217197 on OpenAlexaff
B O Ferreira, Leda Leme Talib, Marco de Tubino Scanavino

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Canadian institutionsSt Joseph's Health CareLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypersexualityPsychologyClinical psychologySexual behavior

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Compulsive sexual behavior disorder (CSBD) or hypersexual behavior has gained global attention due to its adverse impact on health. However, there is just a few data on sex hormones of people reporting CSBD/hypersexual behavior. Objective Here, we investigate correlations between CSBD/hypersexual behavior and sex hormone in a sample of 34 Brazilian men who met the diagnostic criteria for CSBD/hypersexual disorder. Methods After ethical approval, participants provided informed consent and were assessed through the Instrument of Investigation of CSBD Diagnostic Criteria – ICD11, Hypersexual Disorder Screening Inventory (HDSI), Compulsive Sexual Behavior Inventory (CSBI), Sexual Compulsivity Scale (SCS), and Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). Additionally, participants' basal blood levels were evaluated. Results The sample had a mean age of 38.2 years (SD ± 10.05). The median hormone levels of total testosterone 484 ng/dL [356;560], free testosterone 372 pmol/L [285;472], prolactin 9.50 ng/mL [8.30;13.4], estradiol 23.9 pg/mL [23.9;27.5], SHBG 26.7 nmol/L [21.8;33.5], FSH 4.10 IU/L [2.8;5.3], and LH 2.90 IU/L [2.18;3.85]. Mean scores for HDSI, CSBI, SCS, and CTQ were 23.2 (SD ± 3.80), 66.3 (SD ± 8.26), 33.7 (SD ± 4.14), and 37.6 (SD ± 8.03), respectively. Spearman's correlation analyses showed a positive correlation between total with free testosterone levels (Rho: 0.87); Total testosterone levels with SHBG (Rho: 0.59); a negative correlation between total and free testosterone levels with SCS score (Rho: –0.38; Rho: –0.35, respectively); a negative correlation between LH levels and CTQ total scores (Rho: –0.63); a negative correlation between CSBI with SCS scores (Rho: –0.58). Conclusion Our data shows the first exploration between hypersexuality and sex hormones in a Brazilian men sample, supporting previous findings about a relationship of testosterone levels with SCS scores in hypersexual individuals. Financing FAPESP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.147
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Sexual MedicineSame topicSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207