MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393217707 · doi:10.1117/1.nph.11.1.014415

Understanding the nervous system: lessons from Frontiers in Neurophotonics

2024· article· en· W4393217707 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Yves De Koninck, Johanna Alonso, Stéphane Bancelin, Jean-Claude Béı̈que, Erik Bélanger, Catherine Bouchard, Marco Canossa, Johan Chaniot, Daniel Choquet, Marie‐Ève Crochetière, Nanke Cui, Lydia Danglot, Paul De Koninck, Anna Devor, Mathieu Ducros, Angela M. Getz, Mohamed Haouat, Iván Coto Hernández, Nate Jowett, Iason Keramidis, Céline Larivière-Loiselle, Flavie Lavoie‐Cardinal, Harold D. MacGillavry, Asiye Malkoç, Mattia Mancinelli, Pierre Marquet, Steven Minderler, Maxime Moreaud, U. Valentin Nägerl, Katerina Papanikolopoulou, Marie-Ève Paquet, Lorenzo Pavesi, David Perrais, Romain Sansonetti, Martin Thunemann, Beatrice Vignoli, Jenny Yau, Clara Zaccaria

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurophotonics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute on Drug AbuseCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversité de BordeauxCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueAgence Nationale de la RechercheNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFédération pour la Recherche sur le CerveauEuropean CommissionNational Institutes of HealthGovernment of Canada
KeywordsNeuroscienceEvent (particle physics)Computer scienceData scienceCognitive scienceTelecommunicationsEngineering ethicsEngineeringBiologyPsychologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Frontiers in Neurophotonics Symposium is a biennial event that brings together neurobiologists and physicists/engineers who share interest in the development of leading-edge photonics-based approaches to understand and manipulate the nervous system, from its individual molecular components to complex networks in the intact brain. In this Community paper, we highlight several topics that have been featured at the symposium that took place in October 2022 in Québec City, Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.019
Scholarly communication0.0050.011
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurophotonicsSame topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207