Detecting and locating chemical intrusion in water distribution systems using 911 calls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Intentional or unintentional chemical contamination of water distribution systems (WDSs) could have severe health and socio-economic consequences. High potency chemicals constituting, in essence, “super poisons” have the potential to be used in such intrusion scenarios. Some of these contaminants are capable of killing the victim in less than 1 h. Due to their high toxicity levels and short time from exposure to onset of symptoms, 911 call centers are likely the first point of contact for victims or their families with the authorities. Information such as 911 calls could be used to identify the ongoing event and potential intrusion locations. In this way, such emergency calls could function as an intrusion warning system. This study employs network hydraulic modelling to synthesize the 911 call patterns in the aftermath of such events. It then defines the scenarios as a multi-label pattern recognition problem. The synthesized data then was used to train a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The trained AI was applied to a real-world WDS with approximately 4000 km of pipe and 26,000 demand nodes. The results indicated that CNN is capable of accurately recognizing the pattern and pinpointing the originating location of the intrusion with an accuracy greater than 93%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".