A longitudinal perspective on the nature, predictors, and outcomes of work recovery profiles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This person-centred investigation seeks to understand the main configurations taken by four critical dimensions of work recovery experiences (i.e., relaxation, control, mastery, and psychological detachment) among distinct profiles of workers. Capitalizing on a sample of 442 employees who completed the same set of measures two times across a time interval of three months, we further investigate the longitudinal stability of these profiles and of their relations with a series of work-related predictors and well-being indicators. Our results revealed four profiles identical at both time points: Plugged In, Moderately Unplugged, Moderately Plugged In, and Unplugged. These profiles displayed a moderate to high level of within-person stability over time. Workaholism, personal life orientation, and colleagues’ norms about the need to rapidly follow up on work-related messages were all found to be associated with profile membership. Levels of emotional exhaustion and somatization also differed across profiles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".