Case Report: Temporary management of delayed postoperative hypotony with Baerveldt tube: Ab Interno stenting using 3-0 nylon suture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background To describe the management of delayed postoperative hypotony and choroidal detachment in a 79-year-old female patient with advanced pseudoexfoliative open-angle glaucoma. Case The patient, refractory to maximal medical therapy, underwent Baerveldt tube implantation with a ripcord using a 4-0 nylon suture. Ripcord removal and the reintroduction of antiglaucoma medication were initiated in response to a hypertensive phase. Delayed postoperative hypotony and choroidal effusions were managed through ab interno stenting of the tube, employing a 3-0 nylon suture. Ab interno stenting of the tube, employing a short segment of 3-0 nylon suture, initially addressed delayed postoperative hypotony and choroidal effusions. However, recurrence of hypotony and choroidal detachment occurred as the short stent descended into the anterior chamber. To manage the recurrent hypotony, Baerveldt tube truncation was performed, along with re-stenting of the tube using a longer 3-0 Nylon ripcord. Conclusions While ab interno occlusion with a short segment of 3-0 nylon suture may offer temporary hypotony control, the risk of segment descent warranted the use of a longer ripcord to enhance efficacy and stability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".