MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393230681 · doi:10.1136/jitc-2023-008694

Poor clinical outcomes and immunoevasive contexture in CD161<sup>+</sup>CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells barren human pancreatic cancer

2024· article· en· W4393230681 on OpenAlexaff
Qiangda Chen, Hanlin Yin, Zhenlai Jiang, Taochen He, Yuqi Xie, Weilin Mao, Jiande Han, Siyao Liu, Wenhui Lou, Wenchuan Wu, Joseph R. Habib, Jun Yu, Liang Liu, Ning Pu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsPancreas Centre (Canada)
FundersProgram of Shanghai Academic Research LeaderShanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular ImagingFujian Medical UniversityChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationFudan UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaBeijing Xisike Clinical Oncology Research FoundationShanghai Municipal Health Commission
KeywordsPancreatic cancerCytotoxic T cellCancerCancer researchMedicineBiologyInternal medicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The role of CD161 expression on CD8 + T cells in tumor immunology has been explored in a few studies, and the clinical significance of CD161 + CD8 + T cells in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unclear. This study seeks to clarify the prognostic value and molecular characteristics linked to CD161 + CD8 + T cell infiltration in PDAC. Methods This study included 186 patients with confirmed PDAC histology after radical resection. CD161 + CD8 + T cell infiltration was assessed using immunofluorescence staining on tumor microarrays. Flow cytometry and single-cell RNA sequencing were used to evaluate their functional status. Results We observed significant associations between tumor-infiltrating CD161 + CD8 + T cells and clinicopathological factors, such as tumor differentiation, perineural invasion, and serum CA19-9 levels. Patients with higher tumor-infiltrating CD161 + CD8 + T cell levels had longer overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) than those with lower levels. Multivariable analysis confirmed tumor-infiltrating CD161 + CD8 + T cell as an independent prognostic indicator for both OS and RFS. Notably, a combination of tumor-infiltrating CD161 + CD8 + T cell and CA19-9 levels showed a superior power for survival prediction, and patients with low tumor-infiltrating CD161 + CD8 + T cell and high CA19-9 levels had the worst survival. Furthermore, lower tumor-infiltrating CD161 + CD8 + T cells were associated with a better response to adjuvant chemotherapy. Finally, we identified tumor-infiltrating CD161 + CD8 + T cells as a unique subtype of responsive CD8 + T cells characterized by increased levels of cytotoxic cytokines and immune checkpoint molecules. Conclusion CD161 + CD8 + T cells exhibit elevated levels of both cytotoxic and immune-checkpoint molecules, indicating as a potential and attractive target for immunotherapy. The tumor-infiltrating CD161 + CD8 + T cell is a valuable and promising predictor for survival and therapeutic response to adjuvant chemotherapy in PDAC. Further research is warranted to validate its role in the risk stratification and optimization of therapeutic strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.694
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal for ImmunoTherapy of CancerSame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207