Single-nucleus RNA velocity reveals critical synaptic and cell-cycle dysregulations in neuropathologically confirmed Alzheimer’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Typical differential single-nucleus gene expression (snRNA-seq) analyses in Alzheimer's disease (AD) provide fixed snapshots of cellular alterations, making the accurate detection of temporal cell changes challenging. To characterize the dynamic cellular and transcriptomic differences in AD neuropathology, we apply the novel concept of RNA velocity to the study of single-nucleus RNA from the cortex of 60 subjects with varied levels of AD pathology. RNA velocity captures the rate of change of gene expression by comparing intronic and exonic sequence counts. We performed differential analyses to find the significant genes driving both cell type-specific RNA velocity and expression differences in AD, extensively compared these two transcriptomic metrics, and clarified their associations with multiple neuropathologic traits. The results were cross-validated in an independent dataset. Comparison of AD pathology-associated RNA velocity with parallel gene expression differences reveals sets of genes and molecular pathways that underlie the dynamic and static regimes of cell type-specific dysregulations underlying the disease. Differential RNA velocity and its linked progressive neuropathology point to significant dysregulations in synaptic organization and cell development across cell types. Notably, most of the genes underlying this synaptic dysregulation showed increased RNA velocity in AD subjects compared to controls. Accelerated cell changes were also observed in the AD subjects, suggesting that the precocious depletion of precursor cell pools might be associated with neurodegeneration. Overall, this study uncovers active molecular drivers of the spatiotemporal alterations in AD and offers novel insights towards gene- and cell-centric therapeutic strategies accounting for dynamic cell perturbations and synaptic disruptions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".