MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393234552 · doi:10.5206/mase/17134

Unraveling the role of inert biomass in membrane aerated biofilm reactors for simultaneous nitrification and denitrification

2024· article· en· W4393234552 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Maryam Ghasemi, Sheng Chang, Sivabal Sivaloganathan

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics in Applied Sciences and Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAerationNitrificationBiofilmDenitrificationBiomass (ecology)Simultaneous nitrification-denitrificationInertChemistryMembrane reactorPulp and paper industryEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental engineeringMembraneEcologyNitrogenBiologyEngineeringBacteriaBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents an innovative 2D spatio-temporal model that sheds light on the intricate formation of biofilms, incorporating two essential biomass decay pathways: cell lysis and endogenous respiration. The model encompasses heterotrophic bacteria (HB), anaerobic heterotrophic bacteria (AHB), and autotrophic bacteria (AB), offering a comprehensive understanding of multi-species biofilm development. Through meticulous simulations, we explore the primary mechanisms behind inert biomass formation in biofilms, revealing the key roles played by the lysis of HB, AHB, and AB, as well as the endogenous respiration of HB. Moreover, the simulations reveal how species of higher abundance contribute significantly to inert biomass generation, reshaping our understanding of biofilm dynamics. Crucially, this study highlights the indispensability of considering biofilm inert biomass when modeling the nitrification and denitrification behaviors of a membrane aerated biofilm reactor (MABR). The distribution of oxygen and acetate across biofilm thickness is remarkably different when inert biomass is factored in, underscoring the necessity for a more holistic approach to modeling biofilm behavior. With the introduction of the inert biomass inclusive biofilm model, our simulations explore the interactive effects of key process conditions - bulk concentrations of oxygen ($O_{\infty}$), ammonium nitrogen ($N_{1\infty}$), acetate ($A_{\infty}$), and biofilm thickness - on the nitrification and denitrification performance of MABR. A compelling correlation emerges between higher bulk concentrations of oxygen and ammonium nitrogen and optimal nitrification rates, achieving an impressive range of 0.3 to 1.1 g ammonium/$m^{2}/d. Delving into denitrification, we observe that high $O_{\infty}$, low $N_{1\infty}$, and either high or low $A_{\infty}$ levels impede AHB formation and consequently hinder denitrification. Our findings provide a roadmap for achieving simultaneous nitrification and denitrification, contingent on specific conditions: $10[gm^{-3}] < O_{\infty} < 15[gm^{-3}]$, $12[gm^{-3}] < N_{1\infty} < 20[gm^{-3}]$, $A_{\infty}$ ranging from $3[gm^{-3}]$ to $12[gm^{-3}]$, and a biofilm thickness $> 1.4[mm]$. While our study reveals promising avenues for simultaneous nitrification and denitrification, denitrification rates still lag behind nitrification rates under the same conditions. As a result, we advocate for further investigations to devise strategies that can enhance denitrification in MABR systems. In conclusion, this study advances our knowledge of biofilm dynamics by introducing a comprehensive model and illuminating the key factors driving nitrification and denitrification performance in MABRs. These findings pave the way for improved biofilm engineering and wastewater treatment strategies, opening new horizons for sustainable environmental practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematics in Applied Sciences and EngineeringSame topicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen RemovalFrench-language works237,207