MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393261191 · doi:10.18280/mmep.110302

New Simplified Model of Back Surface Field Polycrystalline Silicon Solar Cells

2024· article· en· W4393261191 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Belaidi Ouafia, Bourezig Yamina, Miloua Redouane, Toumi Khalid, Khadraoui Mohammed

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDirection Générale de la Recherche Scientifique et du Développement Technologique
KeywordsPolycrystalline siliconMaterials scienceField (mathematics)Surface (topology)Engineering physicsSiliconEnvironmental scienceOptoelectronicsEngineeringNanotechnologyGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Here, an analytical model is proposed to solve in two dimensions the transport equations of the minority carriers, using the method of separation of variables.The present approach considers that the solar cell is composed, in addition to emitter and base regions, of a non-uniformly doped thin region at the back cell to improve the device output parameters.The model is used to investigate the influence of built-in electric field, grain size and recombination velocities (Sgb and Sb for the grain boundary and back surface respectively) on the distribution of excess carriers and the consequent photovoltaic characteristics.The results showed that, as compared to a typical n+p structure, the addition of a p+ rear surface field region enhances the solar cell's output characteristics under the AM1.5 spectrum.An optimum increase in conversion efficiency, open circuit voltage and photocurrent density were found to be 7.2% (from 14% to 15.02%), 6.4% and 5%, respectively.This demonstrates the potential of BSF cell designs to meaningfully improve commercial polycrystalline silicon solar cell's performance.Additional results indicate that higher performance parameters result from increasing grain size and decreasing grain boundary recombination velocity, and that only a modest electric field is sufficient to eliminate the impact of surface recombination velocity for values less or equal to approximately 5.10 3 cm.s - .Besides, to validate our approach, the values obtained for photovoltaic quantities were compared with other results reported in literature.A good agreement is found.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score0.876

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicSilicon and Solar Cell TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207