An Energy-Aware Cluster Head Selection and Optimal Route Selection Algorithm for Maximizing Network Lifetime in MANETs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quality of Service (QoS) is a crucial aspect of Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANET) that needs examination to demonstrate optimal performance. The scientific community is increasingly concerned with the challenge of developing an energy-aware clustering method for MANETs. This is owing to the fact that the battery-operated sensor devices that form the backbone of these wireless networks cannot be recharged. The selection of a cluster's leader is a difficult problem in MANET. Additionally, the research focuses on Optimal Route Selection (ORS) within the MANET context, acknowledging the significance of establishing efficient communication paths between cluster heads and member nodes. Through the integration of a reliability pair factor and node energy considerations, the proposed ORS algorithm generates optimal paths based on maximizing energy efficiency while minimizing the sum of hops between nodes. The study suggests a new algorithm based on the way waterwheel plants move and change their places as they explore and exploit new territory in the quest for food. The suggested method is named Binary Waterwheel Plant Algorithm (BWPA). In this method, a novel model is used to represent both the binary search space and the mapping from continuous to discrete spaces. Particularly, mathematical models of the fitness and cost functions used by the algorithm are constructed. Through the use of a reliability pair factor and node energy, the proposed research paper on Optimal Route Selection (ORS) generates the optimal path between the cluster head and member node and establishes the path based on the maximum energy and sum of hops among the nodes. By fusing the reactive power of differential evolution with the exhaustive search efficiency of the BWPA, the proposed method extends the life of networks. The recommended method increases node lifetime by compounding the dynamic capabilities of discrepancy evolution with the high effectiveness of search.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".