MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393261221 · doi:10.18280/mmep.110325

Schizophrenia Patient Classification with Long Short-Term Memory Analysis of Electroencephalography Signals

2024· article· en· W4393261221 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fikri Badru Salam, Dina Tri Utari

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Term (time)PsychologyNeuroscienceCognitive psychologyPsychiatryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schizophrenia is a severe mental illness, the main symptoms of which include delusions, hallucinations, and cognitive disturbances.This disease can affect the quality of human life.Schizophrenia affects around 24 million people worldwide.This study involved 14 patients with paranoid schizophrenia and 14 healthy controls with 19 channels.This study aims to apply the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) method to Electroencephalography (EEG) signals for classifying people with schizophrenia.EEG signal analysis uses a bandpass filter with an interval frequency of 0.5 -45 Hz with a maximum EEG segment duration of 5 seconds with an overlap of 1 second.Feature extraction used is based on Frequency-Domain Features.The data is standardized with a scaler by dividing training, validation, and testing data by 80%, 15%, and 15%, with a random state 42.The dense layer uses one layer LSTM, Dropout of 0.25, and Activation ReLu and Adam optimization.Therefore, the model accuracy is 99.94%.The K-Fold Cross Validation evaluation matrix results for the validation dataset are 98.18%.From the selected model, predictions were made using data testing to obtain an evaluation matrix for the diagnosis of schizophrenia, including a precision of 95%, recall of 93%, F1-score of 94%, and accuracy of 94%.Hence, in this study, it is evident that LSTM demonstrates effectiveness in accurately classifying schizophrenia patients using their brainwave data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207