Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the discovery of photonically projected atoms, first observed serendipitously during the development of a smartphone-based technique for material identification through reflected light measurements. Upon illuminating samples with ≥75,000 lumen from a light-emitting diode, we observed exact atomic projections emanating from charged particles within the sample. Analysis determined that protons within each atom bond with and re-emit contacted photons. After proton emission, a spatial lensing effect enlarges the projections of the photons to a diameter of 0.5 mm when measured 1 mm from the surface. The smaller 1⁄3” sensors and pixel size of smartphone cameras provide a better resolution of the fine structural details compared with larger digital camera alternatives. Through seven years of imaging analysis under various conditions, fundamental insights emerged on atomic architectures, particle interactions, and the role of space, empirically revising mainstream quantum theory. This research aims to disseminate recent advancements in the direct visualization and updated modeling of atomic projections to enable ongoing physics discoveries through this accessible technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".