Anti-LAMP-2 Antibody Seropositivity in Children with Primary Systemic Vasculitis Affecting Medium- and Large-Sized Vessels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chronic primary systemic vasculitis (PSV) comprises a group of heterogeneous diseases that are broadly classified by affected blood vessel size, clinical traits and the presence (or absence) of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) against proteinase 3 (PR3) and myeloperoxidase (MPO). In small vessel vasculitis (SVV), ANCA are not present in all patients, and they are rarely detected in patients with vasculitis involving medium (MVV) and large (LVV) blood vessels. Some studies have demonstrated that lysosome-associated membrane protein-2 (LAMP-2/CD107b) is a target of ANCA in SVV, but its presence and prognostic value in childhood MVV and LVV is not known. This study utilized retrospective sera and clinical data obtained from 90 children and adolescents with chronic PSV affecting small (SVV, n = 53), medium (MVV, n = 16), and large (LVV, n = 21) blood vessels. LAMP-2-ANCA were measured in time-of-diagnosis sera using a custom electrochemiluminescence assay. The threshold for seropositivity was established in a comparator cohort of patients with systemic autoinflammatory disease. The proportion of LAMP-2-ANCA-seropositive individuals and sera concentrations of LAMP-2-ANCA were assessed for associations with overall and organ-specific disease activity at diagnosis and one-year follow up. This study demonstrated a greater time-of-diagnosis prevalence and sera concentration of LAMP-2-ANCA in MVV (52.9% seropositive) and LVV (76.2%) compared to SVV (45.3%). Further, LAMP-2-ANCA-seropositive individuals had significantly lower overall, but not organ-specific, disease activity at diagnosis. This did not, however, result in a greater reduction in disease activity or the likelihood of achieving inactive disease one-year after diagnosis. The results of this study demonstrate particularly high prevalence and concentration of LAMP-2-ANCA in chronic PSV that affects large blood vessels and is seronegative for traditional ANCA. Our findings invite reconsideration of roles for autoantigens other than MPO and PR3 in pediatric vasculitis, particularly in medium- and large-sized blood vessels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".