Correlating immediate vapour reactivity with dentin remineralization and tubule occlusion capacity of a bioactive sol-gel borate glass
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of bioactive glass as a mineralization agent in treating dentin hypersensitivity has been established for almost two decades where the melt-quench-derived silicate glass, 45S5, may be regarded as the gold standard formulation. Compared to silicate glasses, borate glasses are less chemically durable and have the potential to mineralize ( i.e., convert to apatite) more rapidly. This study compared the apatite forming capacity of a sol-gel-derived calcium-borate glass, 40CaO–60B 2 O 3 (SGB60), to that of 45S5, on demineralized dentin discs and its ability to occlude tubules on non-demineralized dentin discs, in vitro . Moreover, it investigated the vapour sorption reactivity of the glasses to explore the potential correlation between their immediate aqueous interactions and bioactivity in remineralization solution. Compared to 45S5, SGB60 demonstrated more rapid calcium-phosphate layer formation on demineralized dentin surfaces. On the other hand, after 24 h immersion in remineralization solution, the 45S5-induced calcium-phosphate layer occlusion of tubules in non-demineralized dentin surfaces appeared to be qualitatively greater than that induced by SGB60. Moreover, vapour sorption analysis under either air or nitrogen gas, demonstrated that the reactivity of 45S5 with vapour varied under the different purge gasses, with significant carbonate formation under air. In contrast, SGB60 showed a more rapid rate of initial weight increase with vapour under both purge gasses, and this vapour reactivity may be correlated to its more rapid calcium-phosphate layer formation on demineralized dentin surfaces when immersed in remineralization solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".