MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393281199 · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2024.110359

Updating “machine learning imagery dataset for maize crop: A case of Tanzania” with expanded data to cover the new farming season

2024· article· en· W4393281199 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Neema Mduma, Flavia Mayo

Bibliographic record

VenueData in Brief · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research CentreStyrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
KeywordsTanzaniaAgricultureComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceAgricultural engineeringMachine learningData scienceEnvironmental scienceGeographyEnvironmental planningEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maize Lethal Necrosis (MLN) and Maize Streak Virus (MSV) are among maize diseases which affect productivity in Tanzania and Africa at large. These diseases can be detected early for timely interventions and minimal losses. Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a powerful tool for automated diseases detection, offering several advantages over traditional methods. This article presents the updated dataset of 9356 imagery maize leaves to assist researchers in developing technological solutions for addressing crop diseases. The high-resolution imagery data presented in this dataset were captured using smartphone cameras in farm fields which were not selected in the previously published dataset. Also, data collection was taken in the range of three months from November 2022 to January 2023 to incorporate farming season not covered in the previously published dataset. The presented dataset can be used by researchers in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to develop ML solutions and eliminate the need of manual inspection and reduce human bias. Developing ML solutions require large amount of data therefore, the updated and previously published datasets can be combined to accommodate diverse and wider applicability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData in BriefSame topicSmart Agriculture and AIFrench-language works237,207