MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393285839 · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2024.3382301

Safety-Aware Age of Information (S-AoI) for Collision Risk Minimization in Cell-Free mMIMO Platooning Networks

2024· article· en· W4393285839 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Reza Abedi, Nader Mokari, Mohammad Reza Javan, Hamid Saeedi, Eduard A. Jorswieck, Halim Yanıkömeroğlu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersQatar National Research Fund
KeywordsComputer scienceMetric (unit)Overhead (engineering)CollisionMinificationReal-time computingReduction (mathematics)Performance metricSimulationEmbedded systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, fresh Basic Safety Messages (BSM) (e.g., vehicle’s position and speed) are used to control the Connected Automated Vehicles (CAVs) to reduce Time to Collision (TTC) error which leads to decrease in Collision Risk (CR). In contrast to exiting works, a novel Safety-aware Age of Information (S-AoI) metric is proposed that in addition to AoI, takes into account the risk assessment of CAVs to design an efficient transmission protocol for BSMs. We also deploy user-centric Cell-free-massive-MIMO (CFmMIMO) to improve the communication coverage, accessibility, and reliability, where each CAV is served by a cluster of nearby Access Points (APs). Unlike previous works, a two time-scale distributed deterministic policy gradients algorithm is adopted which greatly reduces the signal processing complexity, system load as well as signaling overhead while maintaining the performance. Simulation results show that the proposed framework, i.e, user-centric CFmMIMO technology together with S-AoI metric, can reduce average TTC error between 24%-35% across different lane change probabilities compared to the baseline scenario in which we use small cell mMIMO with AoI metric. Such a reduction in TTC error results in significant decrease (as high as 75%) in CR ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service ManagementSame topicAge of Information OptimizationFrench-language works237,207