MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393309179 · doi:10.1177/17562864241239101

Serum neurofilament light chain correlations in patients with a first clinical demyelinating event in the REFLEX study: a <i>post hoc</i> analysis

2024· article· en· W4393309179 on OpenAlexaff
Jens Kühle, David Leppert, Gıancarlo Comı, Nicola De Stefano, Ludwig Kappos, Mark S. Freedman, Andrea Seitzinger, Sanjeev Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueTherapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersSerono Symposia International FoundationInternational Progressive MS AllianceNational Research FoundationUniversität BaselCelgeneAlnylam PharmaceuticalsTeva Pharmaceutical IndustriesBiogenSanofiMerck
KeywordsMedicinePost-hoc analysisMultiple sclerosisConfidence intervalHazard ratioInternal medicineProportional hazards modelMagnetic resonance imagingRelapsing remittingMcDonald criteriaPlaceboGastroenterologyPathologyImmunologyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: In REFLEX, subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (sc IFN β-1a) delayed the onset of multiple sclerosis (MS) in patients with a first clinical demyelinating event (FCDE). Objectives: This post hoc analysis aimed to determine whether baseline serum neurofilament light (sNfL) chain can predict conversion to MS and whether correlations exist between baseline sNfL and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics. Methods: sNfL was measured for 494 patients who received sc IFN β-1a 44 μg once weekly (qw; n = 168), three times weekly (tiw; n = 161), or placebo ( n = 165) over 24 months. Median baseline sNfL (26.1 pg/mL) was used to define high/low sNfL subgroups. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox’s proportional hazard model to determine factors influencing the risk of conversion to MS. Kaplan–Meier estimates calculated median time-to-conversion to MS (McDonald 2005 criteria) or clinically definite MS (CDMS; Poser criteria). Correlations between sNfL and MRI findings were assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient ( r). Results: Multivariable models indicated that high baseline sNfL was associated with the likelihood of converting to MS and inversely to time-to-conversion (HR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.03–1.64; p = 0.024). Significant additional factors affecting conversion to McDonald MS were on-study treatment (sc IFN β-1a/placebo; qw: HR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.46–0.76; tiw: HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.34–0.59), classification of FCDE (monofocal/multifocal; HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.55–0.85), and most baseline imaging findings (T2 and T1 gadolinium-enhancing [Gd+] lesions; HR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01–1.03 and HR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.03–1.11); all p ⩽ 0.001. Conversion to CDMS showed similar results. At month 24, sNfL was strongly correlated with a mean number of combined unique active ( r = 0.71), new T2 ( r = 0.72), and new T1 Gd+ ( r = 0.60) lesions; weak correlations were observed between sNfL and clinical outcomes for all treatment groups. Conclusion: Higher baseline sNfL was associated with an increased risk of MS conversion, a risk that was mitigated by treatment with sc IFN β-1a tiw. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00404352. Date registered: 28 November 2006.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTherapeutic Advances in Neurological DisordersSame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207