MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393312986 · doi:10.32782/bses.85-7

FEATURES OF REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENT: FOREIGN EXPERIENCE

2024· article· en· W4393312986 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBlack Sea Economic Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic and Business Development Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCadastreValuation (finance)Real estateBusinessReal propertyRentingCapitalizationLithuanianIncome approachProperty managementCapitalization rateFinanceProperty taxReal estate developmentAccountingGeographyRevenueReal estate investment trustEngineeringCivil engineeringPolitical scienceCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of the article is to study the features of real estate valuation abroad. The article analyzes the experience of real estate valuation in foreign countries. It was found that the Center of Lithuanian Registers operates in Lithuania, which includes the register of immovable property and cadastre, the register of legal entities, the register of addresses and registers of residents. In Georgia, all registers are united in the National Public Register Agency. In Sweden, a general assessment is carried out every six years with the purpose of adjustments if necessary, a simplified general assessment is carried out three years after the general assessment, a special assessment is carried out annually to assess newly built properties. In Slovenia, an infrastructure has been created for more efficient management of land resources and mass valuation of real estate, and a register of sales prices is in place to ensure the collection of information about deals on the real estate market. In Poland, mass assessment is a set of procedures for determining the cadastral value of property for tax purposes. In Switzerland, the cadastral accounting of real estate is carried out at the international and cantonal levels. In France, residential buildings are taxed separately from industrial and commercial objects. The annual rental value is used to estimate the value of commercial buildings. In Australia, Denmark, Sweden and Indonesia, the method of determining the estimated value is based on the comparison of sales prices, in Switzerland, Canada and the Netherlands – on the capitalization of income from the permanent use of real estate. Ukrainian legislation on real estate valuation is analyzed. Its features during the war period are highlighted. It is indicated that access to the State Register of Property Rights to immovable property has been restored, and separate norms and rules have been established regarding registration actions. It has been found that in Ukraine such methodical approaches to assessment as income (profitable), expenditure (property), comparative (market) have been established. Further research should be aimed at revealing the role of economic analysis in the land management system after the end of martial law.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it