Long-term performance of HDPE extrusion welds aged at 85°C in synthetic leachate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of ageing at 85°C of extrusion welds of 1.5 mm-thick high-density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane, immersed in synthetic municipal solid waste leachate, is investigated with respect to its standard oxidative induction time (Std-OIT) and stress crack resistance (SCR). Results show that the heat-affected zones (HAZ) adjacent to the squeeze-out bead (flashing) may exhibit faster STD-OIT depletion than the sheet. Generally, individual weld SCR failure times were observed to be between that of the notched and unnotched sheet. Welds with high welding-induced geometric irregularities (WIGI), and overheated fusion and extrusion welds are shown to result in SCR failure times close to that of a notched sheet. The average time to nominal failure (taken to be when tNF = 250 h) of Cool and Good welding parameter combinations ranges between 3% and 15% shorter than the unnotched sheet. Differences in tNF were attributed to accelerated craze formation in welds with high WIGI from stress concentration. No significant difference was observed between the SCR values of fusion and extrusion welds during 40 months of immersion in MSW-L3. This paper shows that overgrind negatively impacts the SCR of welds and accelerates the degradation of SCR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".