MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393323377 · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202450701058

Synergizing ANSYS Simulations and Machine Learning for Transient Thermal Analysis in Aluminium Alloys

2024· article· en· W4393323377 on OpenAlexaff
Kahtan A. Mohammed, Muthuswamy Jayanthi, M. Shamila, Manish Gupta, Vandana Arora Sethi, Ashwani Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueE3S Web of Conferences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAluminiumTransient (computer programming)Materials scienceThermalMetallurgyMechanical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time-dependent thermal analysis plays a pivotal role in the manufacturing industry as it greatly influences the overall performance of the final product. This study delves into transient thermal analysis of an aluminum alloy concerning both temperature and time. Employing ANSYS, a finite element-based software, an axisymmetric model is constructed. This model encompasses a mold made of sand and a pattern filled with aluminum alloy. The analysis focuses on temperatures ranging from 650 to 1050°C, examining the temperature changes in the mold and pattern after 1500 seconds, primarily due to the convection process. Parameters like heat flux and directional heat flux are also determined. Subsequently, machine learning models are utilized to interpret the data acquired from ANSYS, enabling the extension of the results to a broader temperature range of 1150 to 1550°C. This study is instrumental in facilitating the effective design of transient thermal analysis for various alloys at different temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueE3S Web of ConferencesSame topicAluminum Alloy Microstructure PropertiesFrench-language works237,207