Bibliographic record
Abstract
There has been a positive correlation between sexual activity and physical health, mental health, and overall quality of life. Sexual needs in later life appear to be similar to those in adult life with variations in frequency, intensity, and mode of expression. However, there are a number of societal, ideological, institutional, and physiological factors that can create barriers for adults in later life to achieve sexual expression. It is therefore important to acknowledge the changing nature of sexuality as one ages and not to pathologize it. A sexual dysfunction relates to any issue that arises during one of the stages of the sexual response cycle, which can be a common issue for both males and females especially during the aging process. Inappropriate sexual behaviors in institutionalized settings are more likely to occur in patients with major neurocognitive disorders. Because there is a need to balance autonomy rights of older patients while avoiding paternalism in institutionalized settings, ensuring the safety of patients and other sexual partners is paramount. Clinicians and other healthcare personnel working with older adults need to remain well informed of legal and ethical issues related to the right to consensual sexual activity, which are discussed in this chapter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".