Analisis Kebijakan Luar Negeri Negara-negara Anggota USMCA Studi Kasus Perubahan NAFTA ke USMCA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studi ini menganalisis kebijakan luar negeri negara-negara anggota USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement) dengan fokus pada perubahan dari NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) ke USMCA. USMCA adalah sebuah perjanjian perdagangan multilateral yang menggantikan NAFTA dan melibatkan Amerika Serikat, Meksiko, dan Kanada. Analisis ini bertujuan untuk memahami perubahan kebijakan luar negeri yang terkait dengan perjanjian ini dan bagaimana perubahan tersebut mempengaruhi hubungan antarnegara dan perdagangan di kawasan Amerika Utara. Studi ini mengidentifikasi perubahan utama dalam USMCA dibandingkan dengan NAFTA, termasuk dalam hal ketentuan perdagangan, hukum lingkungan, hak kekayaan intelektual, sektor pertanian, dan industri otomotif. Analisis ini juga mengkaji reaksi dan respon dari masing-masing negara anggota terhadap perubahan ini. Hasil analisis ini memberikan pemahaman yang lebih dalam tentang perubahan kebijakan luar negeri negara-negara anggota USMCA dan dampaknya pada perdagangan dan hubungan antarnegara di Amerika Utara.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".