MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Synthesis and Evaluation of [<sup>18</sup>F]AlF-NOTA-c-<sup>D</sup>VAP: A Novel PET Probe for Imaging GRP78 in Cancer

2024· article· en· W4393334895 on OpenAlexaff
Jiawen Huang, Lu Bai, Dazhi Shi, Wenhao Jiang, Pan Chen, Dong Ye, Xiaojun Zhang, Jiangling Peng, Jinqiang Hou, Yu‐Jing Lu, Xiaohong Huang, Ganghua Tang, Shun Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Pharmaceutics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeat shock proteins research
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityThunder Bay Regional Research Institute
FundersGuangzhou Municipal Science and Technology ProjectSouthern Medical UniversityNatural Science Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBiodistributionChemistryPositron emission tomographyIn vivoMolecular imagingPet imagingImaging agentSpect imagingIn vitroCancer researchNuclear medicineMedicineBiochemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GRP78, a member of the HSP70 superfamily, is an endoplasmic reticulum chaperone protein overexpressed in various cancers, making it a promising target for cancer imaging and therapy. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging offers unique advantages in real time, noninvasive tumor imaging, rendering it a suitable tool for targeting GRP78 in tumor imaging to guide targeted therapy. Several studies have reported successful tumor imaging using PET probes targeting GRP78. However, existing PET probes face challenges such as low tumor uptake, inadequate in vivo distribution, and high abdominal background signal. Therefore, this study introduces a novel peptide PET probe, [ 18 F]AlF-NOTA-c- D VAP, for targeted tumor imaging of GRP78. [ 18 F]AlF-NOTA-c- D VAP was radiolabeled with fluoride-18 using the aluminum-[ 18 F]fluoride ([ 18 F]AlF) method. The study assessed the partition coefficients, stability in vitro, and metabolic stability of [ 18 F]AlF-NOTA-c- D VAP. Micro-PET imaging, pharmacokinetic analysis, and biodistribution studies were carried out in tumor-bearing mice to evaluate the probe’s performance. Docking studies and pharmacokinetic analyses of [ 18 F]AlF-NOTA-c- D VAP were also performed. Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence analyses were conducted to confirm GRP78 expression in tumor tissues. The probe’s binding affinity to GRP78 was analyzed by molecular docking simulation. [ 18 F]AlF-NOTA-c- D VAP was radiolabeled in just 25 min with a high yield of 51 ± 16%, a radiochemical purity of 99%, and molar activity within the range of 20–50 GBq/μmol. [ 18 F]AlF-NOTA-c- D VAP demonstrated high stability in vitro and in vivo, with a logD value of −3.41 ± 0.03. Dynamic PET imaging of [ 18 F]AlF-NOTA-c- D VAP in tumors showed rapid uptake and sustained retention, with minimal background uptake. Biodistribution studies revealed rapid blood clearance and excretion through the kidneys following a single-compartment reversible metabolic model. In PET imaging, the T/M ratios for A549 tumors (high GRP78 expression), MDA-MB-231 tumors (medium expression), and HepG2 tumors (low expression) at 60 min postintravenous injection were 10.48 ± 1.39, 6.25 ± 0.47, and 3.15 ± 1.15% ID/g, respectively, indicating a positive correlation with GRP78 expression. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using [ 18 F]AlF-NOTA-c- D VAP as a PET tracer for imaging GRP78 in tumors. The probe shows promising results in terms of stability, specificity, and tumor targeting. Further research may explore the clinical utility and potential therapeutic applications of this PET tracer for cancer diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular PharmaceuticsSame topicHeat shock proteins researchFrench-language works237,207