MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393360112 · doi:10.1002/cssc.202400162

Oxygen‐Deficient FeNbO<sub>4‐x</sub> In‐Situ Growth in Honey‐Derived N‐Doping Porous Carbon for Overall Water Splitting

2024· article· en· W4393360112 on OpenAlexaff
Hongliang Fu, Yongqing Bai, Yue Lian, Yongfeng Hu, Jing Zhao, Huaihao Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueChemSusChem · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersPriority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education InstitutionsYangzhou UniversityGovernment of Jiangsu Province
KeywordsCatalysisWater splittingOxygenDensity functional theoryCarbon fibersOxygen evolutionElectrolyteElectrochemistryHydrogenMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryDopingAdsorptionChemical engineeringChemistryPhysical chemistryElectrodeComputational chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract It is still a great challenge to reasonably design green, low cost, high activity and good stability catalysts for overall water splitting (OWS). Here, we introduce a novel catalyst with ferric niobate (FeNbO 4 ) in‐situ growing in honey‐derived porous carbon of high specific surface area, and its catalytic activity is further enhanced by micro‐regulation (oxygen vacancy and N‐doping). From the experimental results and density functional theory (DFT) calculations, the oxygen vacancy in catalyst FeNbO 4‐x @NC regulates the local charge density of active site, thus increasing conductivity and optimizing hydrogen/oxygen species adsorption energy. FeNbO 4 in‐situ grows within N‐doping honey‐derived porous carbon, which can enhance active specific surface area exposure, strengthen gaseous substances escape rate, and accelerate electrons/ions transfer and electrolytes diffusion. Moreover, in‐situ Raman also confirms O‐species generation in oxygen evolution reaction (OER). As a result, the catalyst FeNbO 4‐x @NC shows good electrochemical performance in OER, HER and OWS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemSusChemSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207