Analysis of a young Polish firm's use of Green HRM practices with the purpose of achieving sustainable business development
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The concept of incorporating environmental practices into human resource management, commonly referred to as Green HRM, has become increasingly popular. This is because sustainable development, particularly its ecological aspect, plays a crucial role in establishing a competitive edge for modern firms. The objective of the study was to compile a comprehensive inventory of the environmentally conscious human resource policies and processes used by startup enterprises in Poland, and subsequently assess their impact on the long-term sustainability of these organizations. In order to accomplish these objectives, a survey was conducted on a representative sample of 150 young enterprises. Based on the findings, the concept of Green HRM is relatively recent in Poland. There exists a strong correlation between the evaluation of the impact of particular Green HRM initiatives on the long-term sustainability of businesses and their subsequent implementation. The research indicates that a higher rating of an activity's impact resulted in its more frequent implementation in the evaluated firms. Based on the aforementioned analysis, it can be inferred that the dissemination of information regarding the favorable impacts of Green HRM on the sustainability of organizations is crucial in fostering greater adoption of this concept among young Polish enterprises.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it