MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393439813 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6020475

Worldwide Gender Differences in Public Code Contributions - Replication Package

2022· dataset· en· W4393439813 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Davide Rossi, Stefano Zacchiroli

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReplication (statistics)R packageCode (set theory)Computer scienceProgramming languagePolitical scienceBiologyVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<strong>Worldwide Gender Differences in Public Code Contributions - Replication Package</strong> This document describes how to replicate the findings of the paper: Davide Rossi and Stefano Zacchiroli, 2022, <em>Worldwide Gender Differences in Public Code Contributions</em>. In Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS'22), May 21-29, 2022, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3510458.3513011 This document comes with the software needed to mine and analyze the data presented in the paper. <strong>Prerequisites</strong> These instructions assume the use of the bash shell, the Python programming language, the PosgreSQL DBMS (version 11 or later), the zstd compression utility and various usual *nix shell utilities (cat, pv, ...), all of which are available for multiple architectures and OSs.<br> It is advisable to create a Python virtual environment and install the following PyPI packages: <code>click==8.0.3 cycler==0.10.0 gender-guesser==0.4.0 kiwisolver==1.3.2 matplotlib==3.4.3 numpy==1.21.3 pandas==1.3.4 patsy==0.5.2 Pillow==8.4.0 pyparsing==2.4.7 python-dateutil==2.8.2 pytz==2021.3 scipy==1.7.1 six==1.16.0 statsmodels==0.13.0</code> <strong>Initial data</strong> <code>swh-replica</code>, a PostgreSQL database containing a copy of Software Heritage data. The schema for the database is available at https://forge.softwareheritage.org/source/swh-storage/browse/master/swh/storage/sql/.<br> We retrieved these data from Software Heritage, in collaboration with the archive operators, taking an archive snapshot as of 2021-07-07. We cannot make these data available in full as part of the replication package due to both its volume and the presence in it of personal information such as user email addresses. However, equivalent data (stripped of email addresses) can be obtained from the Software Heritage archive dataset, as documented in the article: Antoine Pietri, Diomidis Spinellis, Stefano Zacchiroli, <em>The Software Heritage Graph Dataset: Public software development under one roof</em>. In proceedings of MSR 2019: The 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories, May 2019, Montreal, Canada. Pages 138-142, IEEE 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MSR.2019.00030.<br> Once retrieved, the data can be loaded in PostgreSQL to populate <code>swh-replica</code>. <code>names.tab</code> - forenames and surnames per country with their frequency <code>zones.acc.tab</code> - countries/territories, timezones, population and world zones <code>c_c.tab</code> - ccTDL entities - world zones matches <strong>Data preparation</strong> Export data from the <code>swh-replica</code> database to create <code>commits.csv.zst</code> and <code>authors.csv.zst</code> <code>sh&gt; ./export.sh</code> Run the authors cleanup script to create <code>authors--clean.csv.zst</code> <code>sh&gt; ./cleanup.sh authors.csv.zst</code> Filter out implausible names and create <code>authors--plausible.csv.zst</code> <code>sh&gt; pv authors--clean.csv.zst | unzstd | ./filter_names.py 2&gt; authors--plausible.csv.log | zstdmt &gt; authors--plausible.csv.zst</code> <strong>Gender detection</strong> Run the gender guessing script to create <code>author-fullnames-gender.csv.zst</code> <code>sh&gt; pv authors--plausible.csv.zst | unzstd | ./guess_gender.py --fullname --field 2 | zstdmt &gt; author-fullnames-gender.csv.zst</code> <strong>Database creation and data ingestion</strong> Create the PostgreSQL DB <code>sh&gt; createdb gender-commit </code>Notice that from now on when prepending the <code>psql&gt;</code> prompt we assume the execution of psql on the <code>gender-commit</code> database. Import data into PostgreSQL DB <code>sh&gt; ./import_data.sh</code> <strong>Zone detection</strong> Extract commits data from the DB and create <code>commits.tab</code>, that is used as input for the gender detection script<br> <code>sh&gt; psql -f extract_commits.sql gender-commit</code> Run the world zone detection script to create <code>commit_zones.tab.zst</code> <code>sh&gt; pv commits.tab | ./assign_world_zone.py -a -n names.tab -p zones.acc.tab -x -w 8 | zstdmt &gt; commit_zones.tab.zst </code>Use <code>./assign_world_zone.py --help</code> if you are interested in changing the script parameters. Read zones assignment data from the file into the DB<br> <code>psql&gt; \copy commit_culture from program 'zstdcat commit_zones.tab.zst | cut -f1,6 | grep -Ev ''\s$'''</code> <strong>Extraction and graphs</strong> Run the script to execute the queries to extract the data to plot from the DB. This creates <code>commits_tz.tab</code>, <code>authors_tz.tab</code>, <code>commits_zones.tab</code>, <code>authors_zones.tab</code>, and <code>authors_zones_1620.tab</code>.<br> Edit <code>extract_data.sql</code> if you whish to modify extraction parameters (start/end year, sampling, ...). <code>sh&gt; ./extract_data.sh</code> Run the script to create the graphs from all the previously extracted tabfiles. This will generate <code>commits_tzs.pdf</code>, <code>authors_tzs.pdf</code>, <code>commits_zones.pdf</code>, <code>authors_zones.pdf</code>, and <code>authors_zones_1620.pdf</code>. <code>sh&gt; ./create_charts.sh</code> <strong>Additional graphs</strong> This package also includes some already-made graphs <code>authors_zones_1.pdf</code>: stacked graphs showing the ratio of female authors per world zone through the years, considering all authors with at least one commit per period <code>authors_zones_2.pdf</code>: ditto with at least two commits per period <code>authors_zones_10.pdf</code>: ditto with at least ten commits per period

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionFrench-language works237,207