CCLid: A toolkit to authenticate the genotype and stability of cancer cell lines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CCLid (Cancer Cell Line identification) is designed as a toolkit to address the lack of a publicly available resource for genotype-based cell line authentication. We developed this resource to allow for genotype-matching of any given cancer cell line to the 1,204 unique cell lines found in the CCLE dataset, with support to include additional SNP array datasets. Using the B-allele frequencies (BAFs) for all SNPs found in common between the input data and reference datasets, this tool will allow for a genotype matching operation that trains and uses a logistic model to calculate the probability of the best cell line matches. This is followed by a measure of genetic drift between isogenic lines by look for segments of the genome that have significantly different BAF values. This zenodo dataset contains the (sample x probeset) BAF matrix for the CCLE dataset, as well as supporting datasets to allow mapping of SNP probesets and genotype correction between SNP array technologies (i.e. Affymetrix SNP 6.0 and Illumina HumanOmni 2.5M). This also contains all the metadata for cell line identities in CCLE, GDSC, and gCSI as well their corresponding cellosaurus unique identifies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.041 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".