MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393508083 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.20341016

Dataset: A multi-scale probabilistic atlas of the human connectome

2021· dataset· en· W4393508083 on OpenAlexaff
Yasser Alemán‐Gómez, Alessandra Griffa, Jean‐Christophe Houde, Elena Najdenovska, Meritxell Bach Cuadra, Maxime Descoteaux, Patric Hagmann

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtlas (anatomy)ConnectomeScale (ratio)Probabilistic logicComputer scienceCartographyFunctional connectivityGeographyArtificial intelligenceGeologyNeuroscienceBiologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This repository complements the paper submitted to Scientific Data named A multi-scale probabilistic atlas of the human connectome. Introduction The assessment of the networks underlying brain processes is key to understand brain-related disorders. However, groundbreaking connectomics research is highly demanding in terms of equipment and expertise. The aim of this work is to create a multiscale probabilistic atlas of the human white matter (WM) to carry out network analyses in the context of clinical research, particularly when diffusion data is not directly available. Methods Sixty six subjects from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) database (29 males, age: 22-36 years old) were used to build the WM probabilistic atlas. MRI acquisition protocols are described in (Van Essen et al, 2012). Besides T1-, T2- and diffusion-weighted (DW) images, the HCP database provides the FreeSurfer outputs (Glasser et al, 2016) namely cortical surfaces (pial and white), subcortical segmentation and a cortical surface parcellation containing 34 structures for each hemisphere (Desikan et al, 2006). For each subject, the DWIs were employed to segment each thalamus in seven nuclei (Battistella et al, 2016) and to estimate the WM streamlines distribution. The constrained spherical deconvolution (Tournier et al, 2007) algorithm was used to compute the intravoxel fiber distribution functions for the anatomically-constrained particle-filter tractography approach (Descoteaux et al, 2009) to compute the WM streamlines. Subcortical, thalamic and multiscale cortical (Cammoun et al, 2012) parcellations were gathered to obtain four individual gray matter (GM) parcellations. Finally, for each scale, individual fiber bundles, were created by selecting the streamlines connecting each pair of GM regions (Figure 1a). Atlas construction The T1 and T2 images were non-linearly warped to their corresponding MNI templates (Evans et al, 2012, mni_icbm152_tal_nlin_asym_09c version) using ANTs (Avants et al, 2010). The resulting spatial transformations were applied to warp the individual fiber bundles to stereotactic space and the normalized tract density images (TDIs) were created. In these images, each voxel contains the number of streamlines passing through it. Finally, the spatial probability map for each bundle was obtained by binarizing and averaging the bundle TDIs across the subjects (Figure. 1b). Different views of the developed probabilistic multi-scale connectome atlas are shown in Figure 2. Microstructure Group-average connectomes weighted by microstructure features have been added for Standard Model (SMI) parameters axon signal fraction (f) and inverse extra-axonal perpendicular diffusivity (1/DePerp), and for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters fractional anisotropy (FA) and inverse radial diffusivity (1/RD), as described in: Spencer et al., "The microstructure-weighted human connectome: network properties and structure-function correlations across spatial scales", bioRxiv, 2026 (https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.19.726180).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0660.043

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207