Temperature field of non-Oberbeck–Boussinesq Rayleigh–Bénard convection in a low aspect ratio cell
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A time-resolved experimental investigation was undertaken on the temperature evolution of Rayleigh–Bénard convection (RBC) in a slender convection cell with aspect ratio of Γ=0.1. Experiments were conducted for Rayleigh numbers of Ra=5.3×107, 7.6×107, and 9.5×107 and Prandtl number of Pr≈6 within the non-Oberbeck–Boussinesq (NOB) condition with a temperature difference variation in the range of 30 °C≤ΔT≤40 °C. Measurement of the temperature was by applying time-resolved two-color planar laser-induced fluorescence over the initial 2400 s. Experimental observations showed that the lateral confinement of the convection cell leads to the development of a single large-scale thermal plume instead of multiple plumes. Results showed that contrary to expectations, lateral confinement was found to be ineffective in suppressing temperature oscillations near thermal boundaries. Results also indicated that for Ra=5.3×107, 7.6×107, the temperature oscillations had a frequency of f≈0.028 Hz similar to the frequency of the oscillations in Oberbeck–Boussinesq (OB) RBC. For Ra=9.5×107, however, it was found that the frequency of the oscillations was much lower than the OB RBC with a relatively wide range of the oscillations in the vicinity of f≈0.006 Hz. It is also found that the lateral confinement and formation of singular high-energy thermal plumes leads to an increase in the nonsymmetrical temperature distribution of NOB RBC with a bimodal distribution of the temperature field, deviating significantly from the Gaussian distribution temperature field found in OB RBC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".