MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393551734 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6299090

Large-scale and Multi-dimensional Climate, Genetics, and Phenotypes Database for Maize Yield Predictability in the U.S. and Canada

2022· dataset· en· W4393551734 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Parisa Sarzaeim, Francisco Muñoz‐Arriola, Diego Jarquín

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGenetics and Plant Breeding
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPredictabilityYield (engineering)Scale (ratio)PhenotypeBiologyGeographyGeneticsStatisticsMathematicsGeneCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Improved G2F is a data repository consisting of OMICs (genetic and phenotypic) and environmental data for maize yield predictability across 84 experimental fields in the U.S. and province of ON in Canada between 2014-2017. The G2F genetic dataset contains numerical genotypes of 376 tested maize lines. The G2F phenotypic dataset provides the 8,271 observations of maize yield measurements in the experimental fields. The G2F environmental dataset contains the minimum temperature (<em>T<sub>min</sub></em>)<em>,</em> average temperature (<em>T<sub>mean</sub></em>)<em>, </em>maximum temperature (<em>T<sub>max</sub></em>)<em>,</em> minimum dew point (<em>DP<sub>min</sub></em>)<em>,</em> average dew point (<em>DP<sub>mean</sub></em>)<em>, </em>maximum dew point (<em>DP<sub>max</sub></em>)<em>, </em>minimum relative humidity (<em>RH<sub>min</sub></em>)<em>, </em>average relative humidity (<em>RH<sub>mean</sub></em>)<em>, </em>maximum relative humidity (<em>RH<sub>max</sub></em>)<em>, </em>minimum solar radiation (<em>SR<sub>min</sub></em>)<em>, </em>average solar radiation (<em>SR<sub>mean</sub></em>)<em>, </em>maximum solar radiation (<em>SR<sub>max</sub></em>)<em>, </em>accumulative rainfall (<em>R<sub>acc</sub></em>)<em>, </em>average wind speed (<em>WS<sub>mean</sub></em>), and average wind direction (<em>WD<sub>mean</sub></em>) time series for 84 experiments. <strong>Acknowledgement</strong> The authors acknowledge the support provided by the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Grant number NEB-21-176 and NEB-21-166 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Plant Health and Production and Plant Products: Plant Breeding for Agricultural Production. In addition, we thank the Genomes to Fields (G2F) Initiative for providing the database. We also acknowledge the support from Quantifying Life Sciences Initiative at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Holland Computing Center of the University of Nebraska.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicGenetics and Plant BreedingFrench-language works237,207