Time and momentum resolved characterization of hybrid plasmonic heterostructure Au/WSe2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dataset attached to paper titled "Observation of Multi-Directional Energy Transfer in a Hybrid Plasmonic-Excitonic Nanostructure" with time and momentum characterization of a 2D palsmonic heterostructure formed by Au nanoislands on bulk WSe2. It contains Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) and time-resolved ARPES data (trARPES.zip); femtosecond electron diffraction (FED) data (FED.zip); optical absorption spectroscopy data (Optical_absorbance.zip) and Transmission electron microscopy micrographs (TEM.zip). For trARPES.zip, the following table reports the grid of measurements and most important parameters: Name Sample temperature (K) Pump Wavelength (nm) Pump Duration (fs) Material trARPES_Metis_002.mpes.nxs 300 800 35 Au/WSe2 trARPES_Phoibos_Scan2124.mpes.nxs 300 800 35 WSe2 trARPES_Phoibos_Scan2146.mpes.nxs 70 800 35 WSe2 trARPES_Phoibos_Scan2197.mpes.nxs* 70 800 35 Au/WSe2 trARPES_Phoibos_Scan2198.mpes.nxs* 70 800 35 Au/WSe2 trARPES_Phoibos_Scan2212.mpes.nxs* 300 800 35 Au/WSe2 trARPES_Phoibos_Scan2219.mpes.nxs* 300 800 35 Au/WSe2 trARPES_Phoibos_Scan3159.mpes.nxs 300 1030 200 Au/WSe2 trARPES_Phoibos_Scan3164.mpes.nxs** 300 1030 200 Au/WSe2 trARPES_Phoibos_Scan3185.mpes.nxs 300 1030 200 WSe2 *These scans are acquired with higher angular dispersion requiring separate scans for K and Sigma valleys. **Fluence scan. FED.zip contains the following subfolders: Manuscript_Figure: Experimental data and fit parameters depicted in Figure 4 of the main article. Analysis: Additional information for the FED data including: raw data descriptions (delay, power, filename and more), Matlab scripts with comments, masks and backgrounds for image processing. The Static_patterns subfolder contains electron diffraction patterns of pure WSe2 flakes and Au-covered WSe2 flakes. Optical_absorbance.zip contains the following subfolders & subfiles: without Au & with Au containing all the optical measurements of pristine and Au-covered WSe2 flakes, respectively. comparison_with_and_without_Au.xlsx contains the analysis of the difference curves manuscript_figure.txt contains the data that were used in Figure 1 of the main article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.044 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".