MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393578878 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8215863

Data to 'The updated and improved method for water scarcity impact assessment in LCA, AWARE2.0'

2025· dataset· en· W4393578878 on OpenAlexaff
Georg Seitfudem, Markus Berger, Hannes Müller Schmied

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Twente Research Information · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScarcityWater scarcityEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceEnvironmental economicsEnvironmental resource managementNatural resource economicsEconomicsGeographyArchaeologyAgricultureMicroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset includes the AWARE2.0 characterization factors as documented in the article "The updated and improved method for water scarcity impact assessment in LCA, AWARE2.0" (DOI: 10.1111/jiec.70023). When using the dataset in your own work, please cite the article and provide reference to this zenodo repository. For importing the country-level characterization factors into LCA software, please see the AWARE2.0 implementations (openLCA, SimaPro, brightway2) in IMPACT World+, version 2.1: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14041258 Content - native resolution (monthly, watershed scale): AWARE20_Native_CFs_geospatial.gpkg: Geospatial file containing the AWARE2.0 basins as polygons with associated monthly and annual CFs AWARE20_Native_CFs_geospatial.kmz: Version of AWARE20_Native_CFs_geospatial.gpkg for GoogleEarth AWARE20_Native_CFs.xlsx: AWARE2.0 CFs on basin level (monthly and annual) and associated water consumption used for weighting AWARE20_Intermediate_Variables.xlsx: Intermediate Variables from the calculation of the AWARE2.0 CFs, such as the longterm average natural and actual water availability, the AMDs, the EFRs, etc. figures_AWARE_AWARE20_comparison_all_basins.zip: Figures comparing CFs, AMDs, Natural and Actual Availability, EWRs, and EFR coefficients between AWARE and AWARE2.0, for each of the 8149 basins individually. Consult these figures for a visual impression of how and why CFs might have changed between AWARE and AWARE2.0. - spatiotemporal aggregations: AWARE20_Countries_and_Regions.xlsx: AWARE2.0 CFs aggregated according to geography definitions of GLAM and ecoinvent (version 2.5, applicable to ecoinvent 3.10) AWARE20_Subnational_Resolution.xlsx: AWARE2.0 CFs aggregated to subnational resolution, using the GADM dataset version 4.1 (https://gadm.org/old_versions.html) AWARE20_Crop_Specific.xlsx: AWARE2.0 CFs aggregated according to geography definitions of ecoinvent (version 2.5, applicable to ecoinvent 3.10), using crop-specific irrigation water consumption for 27 crop classes as spatiotemporal weights. See readme sheet in Excel file for more information. Changes: v1.0.1: addition of crop-specific spatiotemporal aggregations (AWARE20_Crop_Specific.xlsx) v1.0.0 (corresponding to published article): update of readme sheets with appropriate references to corresponding article update of reference "Müller Schmied et al. (2024)" added file: AWARE20_Subnational_Resolution.xlsx v0.0.3: use bug-fixed WaterGAP2.2e data from Sept 2023 added country and subnational aggregations changed "NoData" to "NotDefined" in the tables added gridcell pHWC to intermediate variables corrected table of water consumption data without post-processing in "Intermediate_Variables" Caveats: Spatial CF aggregations for treaties: Due to the creation date of the data set, the BRICS aggregations in AWARE20_Countries_and_Regions.xlsx do not include the states that joined after 2023. In AWARE20_Crop_Specific.xlsx, the 10-member BRICS is labeled BRICS+.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Twente Research InformationSame topicEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207