3D IQ Test Task (3D-IQTT) - A Dataset for Quantitative Evaluation of 3D Reconstruction from 2D Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
3D reconstruction is mostly evaluated qualitatively. With this dataset, we are introducing a new difficult quantitative task, the 3D IQ test task (3D-IQTT). It is designed to be similar to mental rotation questions found in some IQ tests. Each element in the dataset consists of 4 images: reference object and answers 1-3. One of the answers is the reference object but randomly rotated. For every question, dataset users have to use their model to pick the rotated model out of the 3 possible answers. The dataset encourages semi-supervised or unsupervised 3D reconstruction because it contains a large corpus of unlabeled data and only a small set of labeled data where the correct answer is known. All the images are of blocky 3D shapes floating in space in front of a black background. Demo scripts for loading/processing the dataset can be found at https://github.com/fgolemo/3D-IQTT The dataset consists of: <pre>3diqtt-v2-train.h5 (XZ-compressed)</pre> <strong>(Training Dataset)</strong> <pre>/labeled</pre> <pre>/questions</pre> format: [10,000 x 4 x 128 x 128 x 3], corresponding to (10k items) x (reference + 3 answers) x (img width) x (img height) x (RGB), np.float32 in range [0,1] <pre>/answers</pre> format: [10,000], corresponding to (10k answers), np.uint8, one of the following three items: [0,1,2] <pre>/unlabeled</pre> <pre>/questions</pre> format: [100,000 x 4 x 128 x 128 x 3], corresponding to (100k items) x (reference + 3 answers) x (img width) x (img height) x (RGB), np.float32 in range [0,1] <pre>3diqtt-v2-test.h5</pre> <strong>(Test Dataset)</strong> <pre>/questions</pre> format: [10,000 x 4 x 128 x 128 x 3], corresponding to (10k items) x (reference + 3 answers) x (img width) x (img height) x (RGB), np.float32 in range [0,1].<br> <strong>Important! This is what you have to evaluate yourself on. We have the correct answers but they are not public.</strong> <pre>3diqtt-v2-val.h5</pre> <strong>(Validation Dataset)</strong> <pre>/questions</pre> format: [10,000 x 4 x 128 x 128 x 3], corresponding to (10k items) x (reference + 3 answers) x (img width) x (img height) x (RGB), np.float32 in range [0,1] <pre>/answers</pre> format [10,000], corresponding to (10k answers), np.uint8, one of the following three items: [0,1,2] <strong>Important:</strong> Before use, the main training dataset (3diqtt-v2-train.h5.xz) needs to be decompressed. This can take up to 24h depending on your hardware. We apologize for any inconvenience caused by this. The uncompressed file has a size of ~74GB. The reason for this compression was a restriction on the size of individual files. The command for decompression is "<strong>unxz</strong><strong> 3diqtt-v2-train.h5.xz</strong>" on Unix machines. <strong>If you use this dataset, please cite it.</strong>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".