A time-course analysis using Differential Static Light Scattering (DSLS) of purified HTT1-3144 Q23 - 2019/01/28
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Project: Biophysical investigation of purified HTT protein samples Experiment: A time-course analysis using Differential Static Light Scattering (DSLS) of purified HTT1-3144Q23 Date completed: 2019/01/28 Rationale: Time and resources in the HD field have been primarily focussed on understanding HTT aggregation looking as caspase cleavage products spanning aa. 1-586 or exon 1 spanning aa. 1-90. However, we know that HTT protein purified in its apo form is able to self-associate into larger oligomeric species and that monomer, dimer and larger species are found following FLAG-affinity chromatography as determined by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) and SEC-multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS). This experiment aimed to begin to investigate how HTT self-associates and aggregates over time in a range of different conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".