MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393663054 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7732338

HETEAC – The Hybrid End-To-End Aerosol Classification model for EarthCARE: Look-Up Table (LUT) for aerosol mixtures

2023· dataset· en· W4393663054 on OpenAlexaff
Ulla Wandinger, Athena Augusta Floutsi, Holger Baars, Moritz Haarig, Albert Ansmann, Anja Hünerbein, Nicole Docter, David P. Donovan, Gerd‐Jan van Zadelhoff, Shannon Mason, Jason N. S. Cole

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerosolTable (database)Lookup tableEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceRemote sensingMeteorologyGeographyData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dataset contains the look-up table (LUT) of EarthCARE’s Hybrid End-To-End Aerosol Classification (HETEAC) model. The LUT contains optical and radiative parameters for four pure aerosol components (fine mode weakly absorbing, fine mode strongly absorbing, coarse mode spherical and coarse mode non-spherical) and their mixtures. In total, 314 aerosol mixtures are considered. The LUT returns the mixing state of an aerosol mixture based on the lidar ratio and the particle linear depolarization ratio at 355 nm. The mixing state is expressed in terms of relative volume contribution of the four pure aerosol components. Additionally, the LUT returns the effective radius, the asymmetry parameter, the single scattering albedo (at 355, 532, 550, 670, 865, 1064, 1650 and 2210 nm) and the Angstrom exponent (at 28 wavelength combinations) of the aerosol mixture. The lidar ratio and the particle linear depolarization ratio is also provided at 532, 550, 670, 865, 1064, 1650 and 2210 nm. The datafile contains two top-level groups: the HeaderData, which contains the header variables, and the ScienceData with the variables. The latter contains two groups, the AerosolComponents, which includes the aerosol-component-related optical and microphysical variables, and the LookUpTable, which contains the HETEAC LUT variables. The variables included in the datafile are listed below. For each variable, a full description is provided in the long_name attribute. HeaderData angstrom_exponent_header ScienceData AerosolComponents backscatter effective_radius extinction logarithmic_width mode_radius_number mode_radius_volume particle_linear_depolarization_ratio refractive_index_imaginary refractive_index_real scattering LookUpTable angstrom_exponent asymmetry_parameter effective_radius lidar_ratio particle_linear_depolarization_ratio relative_volume_contribution single_scattering_albedo radiation_wavelength Contact For any further clarifications or expression of interest with respect to the EarthCARE LUT, please contact Ulla Wandinger (ulla.wandinger@tropos.de) and/or Athena Augusta Floutsi (floutsi@tropos.de).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicAir Quality Monitoring and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207