MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393705824 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7079481

ODP Site 1249, ODP Site 1252, and IODP Site U1325: X-ray fluoresence core scanning, laser diffraction grain size, CNS elemental/isotopic, environmental magnetism, and age model data

2022· dataset· en· W4393705824 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephen C. Phillips, Joel E. Johnson, William C. Clyde, Wei‐Li Hong, Jacob Setera, Marta E. Torres

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyMineralogyCore (optical fiber)DiffractionMaterials scienceOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present data used as part of an integrative early diagenesis study focused on identifying zones of magnetite dissolution and pyrite precipitation in which magnetic susceptibility records are altered in gas-hydrate bearing sediments on the Cascadia Margin using archived cores from the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) and Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP). We analyzed the upper 85 to 100 m below seafloor (mbsf) from ODP Sites 1249 and 1252, and IODP Site U1325. ODP 1249 is at the summit of Hydrate Ridge in an area of active methane seepage and massive gas hydrate accumulations and ODP 1252 is in a nearby slope basin with little occurrence of hydrate. IODP Site U1325 is on the northern Cascadia Margin in a slope basin, with turbidite-hosted gas hydrate. We also include XRF data from the upper sections of ODP Site 1251, IODP U1327, and U1328. These data are associated with the paper "Tracking diagenetic alteration of magnetic susceptibility in thrust ridge and slope basin sediments of the Cascadia margin (ODP Sites 1249 and 1252; IODP Site U1325)" published in Marine Geology in 2025 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2025.107519). We measured X-ray fluorescence using an Avaatech core scanner at the IODP Gulf Coast Repository at Texas A&M University. We measured total carbon, total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen, and total sulfur using a Perkin Elmer 2400 Series CHNS/O Analyzer at the university of New Hampshire (ODP Site 1249 and 1252 only). A subset was analyzed for δ13C-TOC using a Costech ECS 4010 elemental analyzer interfaced with a Thermo Finnegan Delta Plus XP continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometer at Washington State University. Grain size was measured with a Malvern Mastersizer 2000 laser diffraction particle size analyzer and Hydro 2000G dispersal unit at the University of New Hampshire. Mass frequency-dependent magnetic susceptibility was measured using a Bartington MS2 Magnetic Susceptibility Meter and Bartington MS2B dual frequency sensor (Site U1325 only). Isothermal remanent magnetization and thermal demagnetization curves were measured using a HSM2 SQUID-based Spinner Magnetometer with an ASC Scientific IM-10-30 Impulse Magnetizer and ASC Scientific TD-48SC magnetically-shielded oven (Site U1325 only). Radiocarbon was measured on mixed planktic foraminifers at the Radiocarbon was measured at National Ocean Sciences Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (NOSAMS) facility at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (ODP Site 1252 and IODP Site U1325).. Radiocarbon ages were calibrated to calendar ages using CALIB 8.2 and the Marine20 calibration curve. For ODP Site 1252 we used a reservoir correction of 230 ± 50 years (Yaquina Bay, Oregon, USA) and for IODP Site U1325 we used a reservoir correction of 202 ± 50 years (Amphitrite Point, British Columbia, Canada). δ18O was measured on benthic foraminifer Uvigerina peregrina tests using a Finnegan MAT 252 isotope ratio mass spectrometer with Kiel III device at the Oregon State University Stable Isotope Laboratory (ODP 1252) and a Finnegan MAT 253 isotope ratio mass spectrometer with Kiel IV device at the University of Michigan Stable Isotope Laboratory (ODP Site 1249 and IODP Site U1325).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis→French-language works237,207→