MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393726257 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1042138

Strong Grain Neighbour Effects In Polycrystals- Data Set

2018· dataset· en· W4393726257 on OpenAlexaff
Hamidreza Abdolvand, Jonathan P. Wright, A.J. Wilkinson

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Forming Simulation Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSet (abstract data type)Data setStatistical physicsMathematicsComputer sciencePhysicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3D-XRD measurements are for a commercially pure zirconium (CPZr) sample deformed in-situ to 1.2% strain. HR-EBSD measurements are for the same deformed sample after unload. Crystal Plasticity Finite Element (CPFE) simulation was done on the measured micro-structure and results of the NHS model are provided. HR-EBSD and CPFE results are generated using in-house codes. Details of the 3D-XRD codes are provided in the following link: https://sourceforge.net/p/fable/wiki/Home/ The work and further analysis of the results are described in: "Strong Grain Neighbour Effects in Polycrystal" Published in Nature Communications, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02213-9 Other relevant papers: Abdolvand, H., Majkut, M., Oddershede, J., Wright, J., Daymond, M. R., “Study of 3-D Stress Development in Parent and Twin Pairs of a Hexagonal Close-Packed Polycrystal: Part I- In situ Three-Dimensional X-ray Diffraction Measurement”, Acta Materialia, July 2015, Vol 93, Page 246-255. Abdolvand, H., Majkut, M., Oddershede, J., Wright, J., Daymond, M. R., “Study of 3-D Stress Development in Parent and Twin Pairs of a Hexagonal Close-Packed Polycrystal: Part II- Crystal Plasticity Finite Element Modeling”, Acta Materialia, July 2015, Vol 93, Page 235-245. Abdolvand, H., Majkut, M., Oddershede, J., Schmidt, S., Lienert, U., Diak, B., Withers, P. J., Daymond, M. R., “On the Deformation Twinning of MgAZ31B: a Three-Dimensional X-ray Diffraction Experiment and Crystal Plasticity Finite Element Model”, International Journal of Plasticity, July 2015, Vol 70, Page 77-97. Gong, J., Britton, B. T., Cuddihy, M. A., Dunne, F. P. E. & Wilkinson, A. J. Prismatic, basal, and slip strengths of commercially pure Zr by micro-cantilever tests. Acta Mater. 96, 249–257 (2015). Poulsen, H. F. An introduction to three-dimensional X-ray diffraction microscopy. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 45, 1084–1097 (2012) Wilkinson, A. J., Meaden, G. & Dingley, D. J. High-resolution elastic strain measurement from electron backscatter diffraction patterns: New levels of sensitivity. Ultramicroscopy 106, 307–313 (2006)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMetal Forming Simulation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207