MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393756805 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10212339

Climate Solutions Explorer - hazard, impacts and exposure data

2023· dataset· en· W4393756805 on OpenAlex
Michaela Werning, Stefan Frank, Daniel Hooke, Thanh Binh Nguyen, Peter Rafaj, Yusuke Satoh, Michael Wögerer, Volker Krey, Keywan Riahi, Bas van Ruivjen, Edward Byers

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Environmental Impact
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsHazardEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyGeographyClimatologyComputer scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a pre-release dataset and is subject to change. The Climate Solutions Explorer website maps and presents information about mitigation pathways, avoided climate impacts, vulnerabilities and risks arising from development and climate change. www.climate-solutions-explorer.eu Using the latest data, state-of-the-art models were used to assess the future trends of indicators of development- and climate-induced challenges. Updated gridded global climate and impact model data are based on CMIP6 and CMIP5 projections, using a subset of models from the ISIMIP project that have been consistently downscaled and bias-corrected. The data includes various indicators (~30) relating to extremes of precipitation and temperature (e.g. from Expert Team on Climate Change Detection and Indices), hydrological variables including runoff and discharge, heat stress (from wet bulb temperature) events (multiple statistics and durations), and cooling degree days, as well as further indicators relating to air pollution (PM2.5 from the GAINs model), and crop yields and natural habitat land-use change (biodiversity pressure) from the GLOBIOM model. Indicators were calculated at a spatial resolution of 0.5° (approximately 50km at the equator), and subsequently spatially aggregated to the country level – from which population and land area exposure to the impacts were calculated. This has enabled the country-by-country comparison of national climate impacts and avoided exposure. Impacts were calculated at global mean temperature intervals, i.e. 1.2, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, and 3.5 °C, compared to a pre-industrial climate. The dataset includes: Global gridded projections (in netcdf format) of all the climate impact indicators at 0.5° spatial resolution, at global mean temperature intervals of 1.2, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, and 3.5 °C Tabular data (Excel .csv) is also provided, aggregating the impact indicators to the country level, for both hazards and exposure (both population and land) Further details on the methodology and indicator definitions are available on the Data Story page – www.climate-solutions-explorer.eu/story/data. Release Notes (v0.3) Changes in this version: Heatwave data calculated on an annual basis instead for the entire 31-year period Tropical nights and consecutive dry days data calculated using a 2-year window to avoid cutting consecutive periods in half when calculating from January to December only Indicator scores calculated using new bivariate scoring methodology (range 0-6 instead of 0-3) R10 associations for North Macedonia and Ukraine fixed in line with R10 definitions of the IPCC Exposure and avoided impacts data based on new scoring methodology Population exposure calculated using scaled spatial population maps to match data from IIASAPOP2.0 Exposure and avoided impact csv files for R10 regions and EU merged into one file (*_R10_EU)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it