MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393762987 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7600726

An observed population of intermediate-mass helium stars that have been stripped in binaries - theoretical, computational and observational data

2023· dataset· en· W4393762987 on OpenAlexaff
M. R. Drout, Y. Götberg, Bethany Ludwig, J. H. Groh, S. E. de Mink, Anna J. G. O’Grady, Nathan Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStarsHeliumAstrophysicsObservational studyPhysicsPopulationAstronomyDemographyAtomic physicsMathematicsStatisticsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Zenodo repository contains the observational and computational data presented in the manuscript "An observed population of intermediate-mass helium stars stripped in binaries" by Drout, Götberg, Ludwig, Groh, de Mink, O'Grady and Smith. We organize the data as follows: The stacked spectra presented in Figures S16-S21 are located in stacked_spectra.tar.gz, which contains a text file for each star. The text files have three columns that correspond to wavelength in Angstrom, normalized counts, and errors, respectively. The spectral model grid computed based on binary evolutionary model output and presented in detail in the Supplementary information section S1.2.1, is labeled with names starting S121. The file S121_evol_based_006_absolute_magnitudes.txt contains the absolute AB magnitudes for the models in UV and optical filters. The .tar.gz S121_evol_based_006_spectra.tar.gz contains files with the full spectral energy distribution and normalized spectra of each model. The .tar.gz S121_evol_based_006_complete_models.tar.gz contains the full CMFGEN models. For the stellar atmosphere model grid presented in Supplementary material section S1.2.2, we refer to the Zenodo repository 10.5281/zenodo.7976200, which is made available in association with the second paper in our series. We note that we used a subset of that grid in the article associated with this Zenodo repository. We refer to section S1.2.2 for more details. The spectral models demonstrating the mass loss rate variations in Supplementary information section S1.2.3 are presented here with names starting with S123. There is one file containing the absolute magnitudes (S123_mdot_variation_absolute_magnitudes.txt), the S123_mdot_variation_spectra.tar.gz contains the spectral energy distributions and normalized spectra for each of the models, and the S123_mdot_variation_complete_models.tar.gz contains the full CMFGEN models. The spectral model grid computed based on main-sequence evolutionary model output and presented in detail in the Supplementary information section S1.3.1, is labeled with names starting S131. The file S131_MS_evol_based_006_absolute_magnitudes.tar.gz contains three files with the absolute AB magnitudes for the models in the UV and optical filters, each file corresponding to either 20%, 60%, or 90% through the main-sequence evolution and labeled f20, f60, and f90, respectively. S131_MS_evol_based_006_spectra.tar.gz contains three folders labeled f20, f60 and f90, which each contains the SEDs (in Flambda and ABmag) and normalized spectra for the corresponding models. The files S131_MS_evol_based_006_complete_models_fX0.tar.gz contain the complete CMFGEN models. The custom index files we use for astrometry.net in section S3.1.1 are located in the zip file called S311_astrometry_index_files.zip. This information was used to recalculate the astrometry on the Swift UVOT images of the Magellanic Clouds. To make Figure 2B, we calculated the equivalent widths for a set of models assuming a signal-to-noise ratio of 35. This procedure is described in Section S3.7.2. In Figure2B_Model_EWs.zip, we provide three files that each contain these modeled equivalent widths for (1) stripped star models, (2) OB star models, and (3) composite models. To make Figure S7 (see also Sections S1.2.3 and S2.2), which is similar to Figure 2B, but presents the effects of varying the wind mass loss of stripped stars, we used a similar set of modeled equivalent widths as when we produced Figure 2B. These modeled equivalent widths are provided in FigureS7_Model_EWs.zip. To make Figure 3, we calculated equivalent widths for the model grid described in Section S1.2.2 and the TLUSTY OB star grids (see Section S1.3.2) assuming a signal-to-noise ratio of 100. These model equivalent widths are provided in the file called Figure3_Model_EWs.zip.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAstro and Planetary Science→French-language works237,207→