Bibliographic record
Abstract
La traduction a le pouvoir de métamorphoser la culture littéraire. Le rôle de la traductrice ou du traducteur transcende largement celui de la simple transposition d’un contenu littéraire et culturel d’une langue à une autre. L’histoire de la traduction littéraire au Canada est un foisonnement d’activités englobant la promotion, la publication, l’édition de livres et de magazines, ainsi que la recherche. En se penchant sur les multiples facettes du travail des traducteurs littéraires dans la culture canadienne, cet article explore les accomplissements de diverses organisations, telles que l’ATTLC/LTAC et le Conseil des arts dans le rôle qu’il a historiquement joué. L’article examine aussi l’impact de revues telles qu’Ellipse, et met en lumière l’oeuvre cruciale accomplie par les institutions universitaires tout au long de l’histoire de la traduction littéraire au Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".