MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393871930 · doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c09221

Electrophoretic Deposition Interferometric Scattering Mass Photometry

2024· article· en· W4393871930 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Nano · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSurface Roughness and Optical Measurements
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAustrian Science Fund
KeywordsInterferometryPhotometry (optics)ScatteringDeposition (geology)Electrophoretic depositionMaterials sciencePhysicsOpticsRemote sensingNanotechnologyAstronomyGeologyStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interferometric scattering microscopy (iSCAT) has rapidly developed as a quantitative tool for the label-free detection of single macromolecules and nanoparticles. In practice, this measurement records the interferometric scattering signal of individual nanoparticles in solution as they land and stick on a coverslip, exhibiting an intensity that varies linearly with particle volume and an adsorption rate that reflects the solution-phase transport kinetics of the system. Together, such measurements provide a multidimensional gauge of the particle size and concentration in solution over time. However, the landing kinetics of particles in solution also manifest a measurement frequency limitation imposed by the slow long-range mobility of particle diffusion to the measurement interface. Here we introduce an effective means to overcome the inherent diffusion-controlled sampling limitation of spontaneous mass photometry. We term this methodology electrophoretic deposition interferometric scattering microscopy (EPD-iSCAT). This approach uses a coverslip supporting a conductive thin film of indium tin oxide (ITO). Charging this ITO film to a potential of around +1 V electrophoretically draws charged nanoparticles from solution and binds them in the focal plane of the microscope. Regulating this potential offers a direct means of controlling particle deposition. Thus, we find for a 0.1 nM solution of 50 nm polystyrene nanoparticles that the application of +1 V to an EPD-iSCAT coverslip assembly drives an electrophoretic deposition rate constant of 1.7 s –1 μm –2 nM –1 . Removal of the potential causes deposition to cease. This user control of EPD-iSCAT affords a means to apply single-molecule mass photometry to monitor long-term changes in solution, owing to slow kinetic processes. In contrast with conventional coverslips chemically derivatized with charged thin films, EPD-iSCAT maintains a deposition rate that varies linearly with the bulk concentration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.479

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it