Placental metastasis from maternal NUT carcinoma: diagnostic pitfalls and challenges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report a young pregnant woman with large midline thoracic mass and markedly elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels. Initially suspected as a germ cell tumour (GCT) due to age, site, and high AFP levels, a biopsy unveiled a high-grade malignant tumour characterised by undifferentiated monotonous cells. Although tumour cells exhibited positive AFP, the overall immunoprofile did not provide additional evidence to support GCT. Further work-up showed positive for NUT (nuclear protein in testis) immunostaining and the presence of BRD4-NUT1 fusion, confirming the diagnosis of NUT carcinoma. On radiology, there were extensive metastases to lungs, liver, vertebrae, and placenta. Despite aggressive chemotherapy, radiotherapy and immunotherapy, she did not respond to the therapies. Fortunately, her child was not affected by the carcinoma. This is the first case highlighting that thoracic lung primary NUT carcinoma can spread to the placenta and manifest with elevated serum AFP levels, potentially leading to misdiagnosis as GCT both clinically and pathologically.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".