DAIDNet: A Lightweight Domain-Aware Architecture for Automated Detection of Network Penetrations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intrusion detection and prevention has been an area of active research in the use of machine learning for cyber security practices. Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) are one of the best-known models when it comes to accurately classifying intrusions into attack classes or benign profiles but they are resource-intensive. A server is typically associated with large a amount of high-frequency data. In such a condition, deploying ANN for this purpose can cause significant overhead and delays in the delivery of packets to their intended destination. Furthermore, existing deep learning approaches do not address the similarity between different attack classes, the information regarding which can be used to select the defence strategies. We propose a lightweight architecture called DAIDNet that utilizes the information contained by the domain of classes extracted from packet distributions to make better predictions. Results show that DAIDNet achieves better accuracy while being significantly smaller in size than a baseline ANN model. DAIDNet achieves validation accuracy of 99.66% and 99.98% on the NSL-KDD and CICIDS-2018 datasets, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".