MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393926792 · doi:10.1097/ipc.0000000000001354

Central Retinal Vein Occlusion in COVID-19

2024· article· en· W4393926792 on OpenAlexaff
Arunava Saha, Abraham George

Bibliographic record

VenueInfectious Diseases in Clinical Practice · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Optic Conditions
Canadian institutionsSaint-Vincent Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCentral retinal vein occlusionOphthalmologyVisual acuitySurgeryMacular edema

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) secondary to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2–induced coagulation abnormalities is rare. A 32-year-old man presented with bilateral CRVO. He had a history of retinal migraine with occasional floaters and received 2 primary and a booster dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine 7 months prior. Four months before presentation, he developed acute blurring of vision in the left eye and was diagnosed with a nonischemic CRVO with dot-blot hemorrhages. He was managed conservatively with aspirin. Three weeks later, he contracted COVID-19 and received 5 days of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Four weeks after his COVID infection, repeat fundoscopic evaluation demonstrated resolving hemorrhages in the left eye but a new CRVO in the right eye. Antivascular endothelial growth factor injections were deferred because of normal visual acuity. He had a normal magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and a normal bilateral carotid duplex and was planned for close follow-up with ophthalmology. COVID-19 patients presenting with visual symptoms should be screened for CRVO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.419 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInfectious Diseases in Clinical PracticeSame topicRetinal and Optic ConditionsFrench-language works237,207