Frequency of red blood cell allo-immunization in patients undergoing blood transfusion at the Uganda Cancer Institute
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: There is limited data on red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization in patients with cancer in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). We examined the frequency of RBC alloimmunization in transfused patients with cancers in Uganda. Methods: A randomized control trial was conducted on participants at the Uganda Cancer Institute. Eligible participants were age ≥15 years and required blood transfusion. Participants were randomized to receive either leucoreduced or non-leucoreduced blood transfusion. Participants' plasma samples were screened for RBC alloantibodies at enrolment and 3-4 weeks after blood transfusion using a 2-cell panel of reagent group O RBCs using the tube method. Antibody identification was performed using a 10-cell panels of reagent RBCs. Participants were considered alloimmunized if antibodies to RBC antigens were identified. Results: A total of 277 participants were randomized (leucoreduced blood, n=137; non-leucoreduced blood, n=140). Overall, the most represented diagnoses were gynaecological cancers (n=88, 31.8%), acute leukaemia (n=35, 12.6%), and gastrointestinal cancers (n=25, 9.0%). Concomitant HIV infection was present in 26 (9.4%) participants. Most participants received <5 units of blood during the study. No study participant developed allo-antibodies. Conclusion: There was no RBC alloimmunization in participants with cancers. Routine RBC allo-antibody screening in all patients with cancer in SSA requires further research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".